This is government "takings without just compensation" on steroids.
As you'll read, the Hage's won their case...but the deadbeat government refuses to pay up. Instead, government chose to pick another court (9th circuit) in which God only knows what case Judge Navarro ruled on, for her decision was wholly foreign to the case at hand.
As Dr. Angus McIntosh reminds us, "If government could take your property legally, it would have done so years ago."
As you'll read, the Hage's won their case...but the deadbeat government refuses to pay up. Instead, government chose to pick another court (9th circuit) in which God only knows what case Judge Navarro ruled on, for her decision was wholly foreign to the case at hand.
As Dr. Angus McIntosh reminds us, "If government could take your property legally, it would have done so years ago."
The commentors herein, have zero knowledge about federal lands (There are NO "public" lands remaining in the U.S.), private property on federal lands, cattle and conservation.
The commentors can choose one from these 2: They're stupid or complicit. Stupid because they choose not to learn statutes; complicit for they're with the gang that's trying to provide - "unencumbered collater alization" for the loans they secure from Federal Reserve (perhaps China).
Allotment Owners on federal land are "encumbrances," they must vanish from the land
The commentors can choose one from these 2: They're stupid or complicit. Stupid because they choose not to learn statutes; complicit for they're with the gang that's trying to provide - "unencumbered collater alization" for the loans they secure from Federal Reserve (perhaps China).
Allotment Owners on federal land are "encumbrances," they must vanish from the land
No comments:
Post a Comment