Monday, August 9, 2010



Received a video (It's next.) from a researcher friend.
Damn near had a heart attack "trying" to watch. Shut it off immediately!
It's been over a month since, and my stomach and heart still wrench. Will forever.
There is nothing one can say to prepare you for this video. Even all the conversations I've included here, preceding it.
It is pure evil.
The devil.
I sent it to friends in security and law-enforcement. One informed me that when in Islam, they learned it's common for Muslims to stone, beat and behead women (and men) during half times at their sporting events.
I wrestled as to whether or not to send this.
But, a combination of hearing Oklahoma State Representative Rex Duncan say," the courts' willingness in Britain to consider Shariah has become "a cancer upon the survivability of the U.K." Continuing with- the ballot question "will constitute a preemptive strike against Shariah Law coming to Oklahoma." The amendment would require courts to adhere to the laws of the U.S. and state constitutions, as well as federal and state statutes. It would prohibit the courts from considering "the legal precepts of other nations or cultures," including Shariah; meeting Brigette Gabriel and hearing her tell about growing up in Beirut, and having to "prepare for death," when she was only 13 years old, because "Muslims kill infidels!" - The Muslim drive to build a mosque near Ground Zero and receiving this video, add up why I'm compelled to send it.
If you love your family, it is your duty to study the Muslim religion, learn about its founder - the murderous pedophile Muhammad - and get so that you can recognize the signs of Shariah Law, Jihad and Jihadists, so you can help stop even a hint!
Remember: Neither lye or Muslim Jihadists (and their Shariah law) negotiate once they've touched you.
JBS Greeley, CO - is bending to the Somalians who want their Shariah Law enforced at the plant.
As Brigette states clearly, "They Must Be Stopped!"
When asked if she thought President Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim, she said, "It is easy for one to change their name. I know I have - many times. For as a Christian, I must for my own security (There were several armed guards in the room.). If a Muslim truly wants to be a Christian, they WANT to and do change their name. Muslims never change their name."
Then she simply looked at us. NOT let your children near this. Roni
To help you to understand exactly what it is we are fighting against, if you can, please view this short video.
It shows a 12 year old boy being taught by his father how to behead a man. This is a very graphic video, but if you will watch it, you will see exactly what it is that we are fighting against. The people in this video are living in the age that we thought was in our past history, many centuries ago. We can not allow these kind of people who care so little for human life, to succeed in their quest to conquer the world. MW
It's for real...........and those kids are being taken beyond any guilt feelings of committing such atrocities to the point of seeing that action as "normal" and "deserved" by the one the act is committed on - its called brain washing and stealing innocence of youth...MF
How does one even get footage like that, without getting beheaded themselves?
This will haunt me for ever!
I'm going out side to work!!! Roni
The videographer is one of them. They film and broadcast that to show others what will/can happen to those "infidels" and use the films to promote recruitment to their ranks.
One has to be very desensitized to any value of life in any form to do this.
Then again, as far as I'm concerned, we should have free access to films like this showing abortion procedures (including the partial birth abortion) so that we can see how those brutal doctors, nurses and "enlightened liberal" women that murder tens of millions of infants so "enlightened liberal" women can "have control of their bodies" and "life without sin" are no different that those Muslim folks teaching their children to behead their elders. MF
When we invaded Afghanistan and then later Iraq I remember sitting on my couch watching video of the soldiers of the 3rd Infantry fighting next to the Euphrates river. My son George was 5 years old at the time, and he was sitting next to me.
He ask me, "Daa (he still calls me that)...are those our soldiers."
I said, "Yes."
George then says, "Why are they fighting?"
I responded by telling him how the Taliban had attacked us. I told him how Iraq had also attacked Kuwait (hurt women and children), killed lots of people and how we invaded to take it back. I also told him how the 2nd Armored division during the First Gulf war found hundreds and hundreds of chemical weapons-- artillery shells that were supposed to be destroyed, but for 12 years nothing had been done by the Iraqis to prove they had been destroyed.
I told him how in 1993-94 Iraqi agents tried to assassinate George H. Bush in Kuwait, but we did nothing about it. I told him how Iraqi agents also bombed the World Trade Center back in 1993.
I told him how 19 UN Resolutions to force Iraq to comply with the cease fire had done anything. I told him how this terrorist thug named Saddam Hussein was funding PLO suicide bombers in Israel. I told him how this same thug was threatening all the people in the region again and again.
Well you know what he said to me?
"Daa...sometimes people just need killed huh?"
I said, "Yes son they do." ...MR
Yes, we got to tell our children how America will only be great if and only if we are willing to fight and die for our country ... we have too many enemies from within...and we must not forget the fallen soldiers is painful to watch what is good about this great land being belittled by bad Americans ...MS
Pol Pot did the same sort of thing when he pulled homeless young boys down from the mountains and forests and taught them terror tactics. Keep in mind Pol Pot was educated in Paris and was from a successful family in Cambodia. So it wasn't like he was nursing some sort of vendetta, or that he was ignorant or even abused by his parents. He wasn't. Yet he killed over a million Cambodians.
It's the mainstream press and govt. fence-sitters that need to see this stuff, verify it, confirm there are no "special effects," etc...
Our fellow patriots are already concerned and know that the real terrorists are using the tactics they learned at the hand of Communists, just like Pol Pot did when he hooked up with them in Paris. Our ludicrous excuse for a press, however, will not report the facts, mostly because they have bought into socialism and/or Marxism, sometimes without even realizing it, inasmuch as they started getting this message in school beginning 40 years ago. They need to be shocked out of their complacency. Their present, "free-to-be," elitist lifestyle certainly didn't include beheading and stonings and burquas.
They need to hear it from the Brits (as per your message here), because their people & govt. have mostly have turned to socialism, a little before us, actually.
But they nevertheless are clueless when it comes to the threat of Shariah law within their own county.
Moreover, preaching to the choir here is not going to be enough. It wasn't in the 60s and it certainly isn't now. We all need to get this stuff into the hands of people, in govt. and the press,. Just maybe, they will get their head out of the sand and realize how much trouble we are about to be in, and start doing their job of protecting this country and its people instead of targeting them with a bunch of politically correct "gotcha" nonsense!
Best, Bev
All I can say is I am stunned, but not sure why.
I watched the beheading of the journalist years ago, so thought I got the depravity of the culture.
I watch the planes fly into the twin towers, over and over again, I thought I understood the heinous nature of these people. I didn't and my stomach hurts too. sharon
I've long been familiar with such scenes because of my wide contacts and travel, and have pondered the problem of Islam, studied its texts, spoken with its adherents, and examined its values for many years. My message here ends with a question that is difficult to face, but I'll pose it for your consideration anyway. Observation: Islam is irreconcilably and irretrievably at war with the West. Demographic: There are about 1.57 billion Muslims in the world. Strategic fact: In order to win the war against Islam, it is necessary for the West to kill 1.57 billion Muslims and to exterminate all who attempt to revive it. Question: Are you personally willing, with a gun in your own hand, to put a bullet in the brain of 1.57 billion men, women and children, some of whom may not be extreme Islamists but who might become such? I personally am not. But I would like to hear any thoughtful reframing of the problem. George
Oh my goodness Roni, I could not watch it, I immediately turned it off. Made me so sick to my stomach, but I know it is true. Our President is a 'Muslim'; although I do not know his heart but I know he is not a Christian. I just viewed another video of him mocking God and the Bible. It is sad that so many dumbfounders went to polls and voted for this questionable man or did they? Did Acorn and the far left cheat to have him win the election? I don't know the answer to these questions, but I wonder deep down if he wasn't elected by the right way of democracy. Anyway it must have been in God's plan because there are several of us wide awake now, many more have to wake up still. I believe he should be impeached! He has broken laws and disregarded the constitution in which he took an oath to uphold. He is a disgrace to the oval office! The idiots that believed in him once but have changed their minds is a relief, but we must continue to spread the truth about this man occupying the greatest office in the world. Those that say they don't care need to see this video. It is coming the U.S. very rapidly make no mistake about it..Pauline
Article by unknown
Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.
Islam has religious,legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges. When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.
Here's how it works:
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:
United States -- Muslim 0.6%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1.8%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:
Guyana --Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 15%
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings
of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in: Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon --Muslim 59.7%
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, as in:
Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these
nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such going's on have been experienced in:
Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because
everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%
Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.
I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our
father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'
It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos.
There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.
Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century.
We are letting the fox guard the henhouse. The wolves will be herding the sheep! Two devout Muslims are in Homeland
Security posts.
Arif Alikhan, a devout Muslim, as Assistant Secretary for Policy Development.
Kareem Shora, a devout Muslim who was born in Damascus, Syria, as ADC National Executive Director as a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC).
NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a government official being identified as a devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a devout Protestant...? Just wondering.
Devout Muslims in critical Homeland Security positions? Does this make you feel safer? That should make the US ' homeland much safer, right? Was it not Devout Muslim Men who flew the planes into those buildings 8 years ago? Was it not a Devout Muslim who killed 13 at Fort Hood?
Also: This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so
quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities.
Can a good Muslim be a good American?
This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:
No, Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia
Religiously - No, Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)(Koran)
Scripturally - No, Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.
Geographically - No Because his allegiance is to Mecca ,to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially - No, Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.
Politically - No, Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of
America , the great Satan,
Domestically - No, Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge a wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34)
Intellectually - No, Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically - No, Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.
Spiritually - No, Because when we declare 'one nation under God,' the Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran's 99 excellent names.
Therefore, after much study and deliberation.... Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. - - - It seems unlikely that they can be both 'good' Muslims and good Americans.
Call it what you wish, it's still the truth. The religious war is bigger than we know or understand.
Can a muslim be a good soldier?
Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, opened fire at Ft. Hood and Killed 13. He is a good Muslim!!!
The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within.
Author unknown
Hi Roni,
Please help me get this straight. After reading all this, and carefully analyzing it, it appears to me that the only conclusion implied by all the assertions and all the comments is that every Muslim on earth must be killed.
That conclusion is never stated clearly, but is implied by every statement.
I would like to see if that is the correct conclusion, and have it stated in clear, honest and straightforward words: "Yes" or "No."
I also respect the right of the anonymous author and the commentators to evade that conclusion or to refuse to answer the question.
I respectfully ask if that is your personal conclusion.
I'm not asking whether or not you think it is the conclusion of the other commentators or the conclusion of the anonymous author.
I would appreciate a straightforward yes or no answer or a straightforward refusal to answer.
Please, nothing else, just "Kill them all" or "No, don't kill them all" or "I don't want to answer that."
I will understand no matter which, so please don't expand on your answer.
The only answer I need is "Yes" or "No" or "I refuse to answer." Please.
I do need help in understanding the purpose of the messages below.
But, even though I know you like to write extensively on a subject, I really can't deal with anything other than a simple, straightforward answer to a simple, straightforward question.
The exact question is: "must every Muslim on earth be killed?"
The exact answers are (please pick one):
1. Yes.
2. No.
3. I don't want to answer.
Thank you for considering this request. George
Dear George,
I don't know who wrote that piece...and - no excuse but - didn't take time to investigate who did.
Interestingly enough, I just heard from a professor who answered, "a good Muslim is a dead Muslim."
Now - thinking on both your question and the profs comment, combined with what I learned from my Vietnam vet X husband, Green Beret cousin, FBI friends and so forth, let me answer in this way.
No. I don't think carte blanche "kill every Muslim on earth." Nor did I get that impression from unknown writer.
If I thought that way, then wouldn't I'd be subscribing to their way? And opposing myself?
But, if I had reason to believe they - or anyone for that matter - put me in a position of having to shoot them to protect myself, you my friend, my neighbor or loved one, I'd do so with dead aim.
The before-mentioned explained well how fighting cultures wherein lives are expendable, was horrific beyond horrific. They KNEW that a baby buggy with the baby - also contained a bomb. They knew, that to save their life, they were left with zero choice as to take the baby’s life.
No wonder we know Vietnam Vets who have slid over the deep edge; for nothing rids their minds of those impermeable, unresolvable, tragic images.
It's wise to exercise preventive maintenance and use necessary precautions against anything known to be harmful...whether the rattler out on the range, cancer giving sun, un-planned pregnancy, hot stove, wasp nest, buggies with bombs, Holstein bulls, snake oil salesmen, rapists, drugs (prescription and illegal) and quick sand. Anyway - you get the picture.
OK. OK. This is ONE area I agree with employing a "precautionary principle."
Regards specifically the Shariah Law? To me there's no gray area. It's black and white. It seeks to eradicate infidels and America's constitution; and that, is non-negotiably unacceptable!
This is one American who will not cower in a politically correct corner, thumb up my ass afraid of Bill Maher and Joy Behar taunts, fearful I might offend the very thing that intends to kill my family, neighbor, you, me, and our country...just because we’re not...Muslim.
After reading this, I’m not sure I answered your question. Did I?
Thank you for asking, Roni
No. George
Good Morning George,
Had to run to Parker yesterday. Received this late, late last night.
Then I couldn't sleep.
I realized never once did I think to ask why you ask..."must every Muslim on earth be killed?"
Now I'm myself.
Why do you ask? Roni
I wanted an answer. George
Then I choose # 3. Roni
Dear Roni,
I truly appreciate that answer. Simplicity was the essence of my question.
There are many reasons I wanted a simple answer, mostly because the question is so complex that nobody faces squarely the central intractable problem: there is no version of Islam that can respect the First Amendment.
You asked what brought it up in my mind. The answer is, my long study of all major religions and the endless history of war between the West and Islam. Remember that war began with the First Pope Urban II in 1095 after the Muslims had conquered the entire Levant, including Jerusalem. to "rescue the Holy Land from the infidel Turks." Urban was responding to a call for aid from Byzantine Emperor Alexius I to repel the invasion of the Seljuk Turks from Anatolia. The Knights Templar captured Jerusalem in 1099, but refused to give it to Alexius (Christians hadn't controlled Jerusalem for nearly 500 years at the time anyway) and kept it as their own new State of Jerusalem.
After that beginning, Islam and the West have been at war, with very few instances of peace and co-existence, the most remarkable being in Islamic Spain (Muslims were called by the Spaniards "Moors," a word that came from their original home in Morocco) at about the same time as the First Crusade. There was a city-state in Spain, Valencia, that was ruled by Rodrigo de Bivar (from the Spanish Kingdom of Castile and Leon), known as El Cid (meaning "the lord," as in a feudal lord or ruler) whose army was mixed Christian and Muslim, as were his administrators. That cooperation lasted through the Cid's death in 1099, the year the Templars conquered Jerusalem, for three years of rule by his wife Jimena, and then dissolved into war.
Since then, it's been one war after another, so overlapping it's hard to tell one from the next.
The Muslims themselves present the West with conflicting emotions: After the first explosion of Islam to conquer Arabia and North Africa, the Muslims became the only intellectual light left in the world when Europe slid into the dark ages. From the Muslims we got our numbers, 1 thru 9 and the concept of zero as a mathematical place-marker. Algebra (from Arabic al-jabr, meaning "restoration") was developed by Muslims (from scholars in India and earlier in Greek Alexandria, who invented it, but could not systematize it). The basis of modern medicine from hematology and peer-reviewed experimental science to surgery and anaesthesiology, was developed by Muslims because the Quran says, "For every disease, Allah has given a cure," and the belief that there is a cure for every disease encouraged early Muslims to engage in medical research. While Islam enjoyed a Golden Age, knowledge died in Europe except in a few monasteries in Ireland (of all places) whose copyists kept Greek and Roman literature and science alive.
In contrast, Musilms have been at war with themselves from the death of Muhammad, first between two sides of his family and since then in ever-diverging sects. Each sect developed its own sacred law (Sharia) so now the law is determined differently in almost every town or region by committees of religious leaders with a hierarchy of power, much like a corporation, and there is endless confusion between customary law and Sharia. One Sharia committee may rule over thousands and others over only a few families, but none rule more than a small fraction of all Muslims. So Sharia is a baffling tangle of divergent rules.
Most but not all versions of Sharia are absolutely hostile to any other belief system. A few are tolerant within limits. None are compatible with Western beliefs or political systems. Islam hates capitalism and communism equally. Islam hates democracy and totalitarianism equally. They hate Western notions of civil liberty, and particularly America's non-religious civil liberties that forbid government from passing laws respecting an establishment of religion. On that point, all the hundreds of Sharia and their courts agree,because Sharia is sacred law and thus must be established by government, and we forbid it. Go read the Wiki on Sharia to grasp the complexity of the problem.
Bottom line: our constitutional imperative to never legislate against the free exercise of religion is in direct contravention of our need to survive.
Nobody will face that simple fact. So, if we kill every Muslim in a global genocide, we have not gone beyond our Constitution, which gives Congress power to declare war and suppress insurrections, but we have violated non-constitutional moral principles that many Americans hold as inviolable. If we did that, it's hard to image another nation that would approve. If we did that, it's hard to imagine that someone wouldn't recreate Islam and keep the cycle of death and destruction going.
If we don't kill every Muslim, we are faced with an implacable enemy that will never stop trying to destroy us, prompting security measures so restrictive that it makes us captive in our own land. If we try to negotiate with Islamists (an extreme sect of Islam of the Wahabi school, including al-Queda), they will ignore any accord reached. If we encourage semi-friendly Islamic states such as Turkey, to fight and kill extreme members of their own faith, will they do it? And if they do, what will our relations with them be afterward? And so on.
I can't find anyone ready to say what we should do about Islam and its tangle of sacred laws ruled by committee (Sharia).
I'd like to find someone able to confront that question with a direct answer.
Thank you again for #3. That's about as good as I could do right now if someone asked me. George

No comments: